OK, I asked another question yesterday about "unknowingly being sold a car with a salvage title" — http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20061128073937AAwWAu9 — which the dealership is supposedly still uncertain of.
Well, the saga continues. Now they claim they should get the title today, they’re just waiting for the auction people to send it. I’ve been told that the auction part is normal, though them not knowing any details about their purchase seems odd, to say the least.
They’re claiming they’re in the same position I’m in! Isn’t it their responsibility to know? Plus when I asked they insisted it hadn’t been in a wreck, and they went further to give me a warranty.
Assuming the car has only been in a wreck (that resulted in a settlement for k in 12/2005) how does that effect the so-called "bumper-to-bumper" warranty they gave me? Is this alone fraud, even if it doesn’t have a salvage title?
Shouldn’t they reduce the price? Am I stuck?
(I’m in TX.)
I purchased the car 11/22 but didn’t get the insurance stuff until after the Thanksgiving holiday. That’s when my insurance agent discovered the wreck, on 11/27.
I have called the TX Attorney General and the DMV and they’re telling me to submit a complaint. I’m going to call the legal people provided through my job later today, but I was hoping to settle this peacefully.
Initially they seemed to won’t to resolve this, yesterday they implied they were already looking for a new Ion, and insisted they wouldn’t leave me in a wrecked vehicle.
Now it just seems like they’re trying to get out of it and shirk responsibility. But I don’t think ignorance is an adequate defense. At the very least I think the price should be lowered, or I should be released from the contract.
I do know that I would not have bought the car had they told me it was in a k wreck and they acknowledge that that’s likely the case. Still, they insist the wreck doesn’t effect our deal.
I got it from a smaller local dealer called "Auto Max."
My issue with the wreck is that I specifically asked if it had been in a wreck and they said no. I asked two separate salesmen and they both said no.
My insurance agent only found the k claim through one insurance company — he was checking them all for the lowest price. None of the other insurance companies were showing this claim BUT I’m sure the dealership knew what was what.
I can’t accept that the auction didn’t let them know the history of that car — I’m sure the truth of the matter was in the price they paid for it. If they got a severely discounted price on it they had to know why, in my opinion. I doubt they got gypped too.
Though, I did initially give them the benefit of the doubt, thinking maybe they really didn’t know, but now I’m thinking the shock was more a reaction to the fact that I found out about it, rather than true ignorance/innocence.
And still, they claim they don’t have the title.